State v. Grossberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• revoking pro hac vice admission because an attorney made inaccurate representations to the court and violated other Rules of Professional Conduct
• revoking attorney’s pro hac admission after he gave statements violating court order and Rule 3.6 and arranged for his client and parents to do interviews during which they made statements that he could not have made under Rule 3.6
• “[The duty of candor] includes responsibility to promptly inform the Court and opposing counsel of any development which renders material representations to the Court inaccurate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).