Skip to main content
· 1/5/2024

State v. Gronbeck

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 26

Syllabus

The trial court's overruling of non-party appellants' motion to quash and objections to defendant's subpoenas is not a final, appealable order because (1) no records were ordered disclosed to the defendant and (2) the trial court has scheduled an in-camera review to determine which records, if any, should be disclosed. Under these circumstances, the overruling of the motion to quash and the objections neither determined the action with respect to the subpoenas nor prevented a judgment in appellants' favor, as required for a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4). Appeal dismissed for lack of a final, appealable order.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.