State v. Grmoljez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence “prohibits the admissibility of statements made in settlement negotiations if offered to prove liability or the amount of a claim”
• stating that Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence “prohibits the admissibility of statements made in settlement negotiations if offered to prove liability or the amount of a claim”
• stating that Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence “prohibits the admissibility of statements made in settlement negotiations if offered to prove liability or the amount of a claim”
• explaining the “presumption that claims by the same party arising out of the same contract constitute the same claim for res judicata purposes”
• “ ‘[I]f the claimant, before filing its first suit, is in possession of all the facts on which its second suit is based, the splitting of the claims into multiple suits is fatal to maintenance of the later-filed action.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).