Skip to main content

State v. Grimes

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3795

Syllabus

GUILTY PLEA — CRIM.R. 11(C)(2) — SENTENCING — COUNSEL: Where defendant failed to demonstrate that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered due to his confusion regarding the nature of his weapons-under-disability charge, and the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11., the court did not err in accepting defendant's guilty plea. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to move to withdraw a plea or ensure defendant understood the nature of the charge against him where the plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Defendant's sentences were supported by the record and were not contrary to law where the trial court sentenced defendant within the relevant statutory range and properly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing and the felony sentencing factors in sentencing defendant.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.