State v. Grijalva

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding restitution where it was requested eighteen months after sentencing
• “[A]lthough a victim may waive restitution by failing to comply with a time limit set by the court, this rule is a matter of procedure. A procedural rule is based on the orderly administration of justice rather than the court’s jurisdiction.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Swoopes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-19· cited 123×
• Town of South Tucson v. Board of Supervisors
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1938-11-28· cited 57×
• State v. Fancher
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-10-01· cited 33×
• State v. Bryant
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-24· cited 31×
• Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/state
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2013-03-05· cited 19×
• State v. Holguin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-04· cited 18×
• State v. ZAPUTIL
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-10· cited 18×
• State of Arizona v. Anthony Connue Serrano
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-05-07· cited 17×
• In Re Alton D.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 14×
• In Re Michelle G.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-10· cited 7×
• State v. Nuckols
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-12· cited 5×