Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 1/13/1988

State v. Griffiths

Citations

  • 752 P.2d 879
  • 73 Utah Adv. Rep. 79
  • 1988 Utah LEXIS 8
  • 1988 WL 23024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, by failing to move for continuance, “defendant waived relief under rule 16(g) ... by not making timely efforts to mitigate or eliminate the prejudice caused by the prosecutor’s conduct”
  • explaining that the defendant had not preserved a claim that trial ought to have been continued due to the nonappearance of one of his witnesses where the defendant made no such motion or objection to the trial court
  • there is no reason able likelihood that without the error the jury would have reached a different verdict
  • it is well settled that trial court rulings on admissibility of evidence are not to be overturned in absence of clear abuse of discretion
  • it is well settled that trial court rulings on admissibility of evidence are not to be overturned in absence of clear abuse of discretion
  • it is well settled that the trial court rulings on the admissibility of evidence are not to be overturned in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.