Skip to main content

State v. Griffith

Citations

  • 2 Del. Ch. 392

Syllabus

<p>Charitable uses are not within the rule of law against perpetuities.</p> <p>A devise of real estate, with a direction that the same be not sold but rented— “the proceeds arising from such rents” to be applied to certain charitable uses—held, not to be within the law against perpetuities. Prior to the English Statute of 9 Geo. II, charitable uses in England were subject to no restriction.</p> <p>The English mortmain acts did not extend to the British colonies.</p> <p>The Delaware Statute of 17 Geo. II, for the relief of religious societies, &c., considered; its history and objects. The prohibitions in this statute against testamentary gifts of real estate to religious societies do not affect charitable uses generally.</p> <p>A devise to certain charitable uses of a fund, to be distributed “by agents, to be appointed by the Orphans’ Court or the Levy Court of Kent County, as maybe deemed most proper,” is not void, for uncertainty as to. which one of the two Courts shall appoint the agents. Either Court may exercise the power of appointment. If both refuse, this Court will appoint. So, were the power of appointment void for uncertainty, this Court would have power to create the necessary agency.</p> <p>Distinction between limitations of the legal estate and limitations by way of trust, with respect to the degree of certainty requisite in the objects to take.</p> <p>A devise of lands in trust “to and for the support, maintenance and education of the poor white citizens of Kent County generally,” coupled with a direction that no partof the bequest should “be applied to the use or benefit of any person or persons residing within the walls of the Poor House, but to be distributed amongst such only of the poor who by timely assistance may be kept from being carried to the Poor House and becoming subjects thereof,” is not void for uncertainty in the description of the objects.</p> <p>Uncertainty as to the individual beneficiaries, until appointment or selection, is charac

Judges: Johns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.