State v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a party seeking to admit a text message must “provide some indicia of authorship to satisfy its authentication obligation”
• “If the record includes statements made by an opposing party and is offered against that opposing party, those statements 4 SECURA v. SUDHOFF Decision of the Court are not hearsay.”
• court properly admitted messages “made by and offered against a party-opponent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lavers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
• State of Arizona v. Steven John Parker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2013-03-13· cited 110×
• United States v. Vayner
  Second Circuit· 2014-10-03· cited 95×
• United States v. Tony Browne
  Third Circuit· 2016-08-25· cited 65×
• State v. Haight-Gyuro
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-06-18· cited 61×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-11-21· cited 48×
• Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-06-17· cited 43×
• State v. McCurdy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-10-24· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Meola
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-05-22· cited 34×
• State v. Fell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-04-04· cited 5×