Supreme Court of Alabama· 2/14/1974
State v. Griffith
Citations
- 290 So. 2d 162
- 292 Ala. 123
- 1974 Ala. LEXIS 1031
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admission against interest theory is minority theory which Alabama does not follow
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merrill, Heflin, Harwood, Maddox, Faulkner, Jjt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sharpe v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Sharpe)N.D. Alabama· 2010-01-26· cited 8×
- Presley v. B.I.C. Construction, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-09-04· cited 6×
- State v. GREAT VALLEY LAND AND INVESTMENT CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1974-07-03· cited 5×
- Jones v. EstelleSupreme Court of Alabama· 1977-07-29· cited 3×
- Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. JenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-12-01· cited 3×
- Emerik Properties Corp. v. Jefferson County Board of Equalization & AdjustmentsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-04-11· cited 2×
- City of Murfreesboro v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-12-17
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama· 1959-03-12· cited 50×
- Louisiana Ry. & Navigation Co. v. MorereSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1906-05-21· cited 28×
- Pratt Cons. Coal Co. v. MortonAlabama Court of Appeals· 1915-04-15· cited 7×
- Etowah County v. Clubview Heights CompanySupreme Court of Alabama· 1958-04-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.