State v. Griffin
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1699
Syllabus
SEARCH AND SEIZURE – SEARCH WARRANT - STALENESS: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence found during the search of his home in accord with a warrant where the warrant listed having weapons under disability rather than felonious assault, which was the offense that the police were investigating, because the failure to specify the offense to which the evidence is related by name or code section in the affidavit is not constitutionally significant and does not require the suppression of evidence seized pursuant to that warrant. The information in the affidavit supporting the search warrant was not stale where the warrant was sought a week after a shooting as part of an ongoing investigation and where the perpetrator was originally unidentified.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court· 2005-11-30· cited 390×
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-30· cited 10×
- State v. LangOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-21· cited 8×
- State v. LackeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-13· cited 4×
- State v. WhittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.