State v. Gregory
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1098
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in refusing to merge several convictions for voyeurism and illegal use of a minor or impaired person in nudity-oriented material or performance because, among other reasons, the former punishes an individual's trespass on a minor victim's reasonable expectation of privacy and is narrow in scope whereas the latter seeks to more generally combat conduct that supports or encourages the exploitation of children. As a result, each crime was of dissimilar import and could not be merged.
Judges: Siebert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.