State v. Greer
Citations
- 22 W. Va. 800
- 1883 W. Va. LEXIS 102
Syllabus
<p>1. It is the right of the prisoner in a criminal case to be tried in the county, where the alleged offence was committed; a right, which the State cannot take from him. (p. 805.)</p> <p>2. But on the prisoner’s petition, and for good 'cause shown, he may have the venue changed to some other county, (p. 805.)</p> <p>3. The burden is oil the prisoner to show to the satisfaction of the court, good cause to have the trial of the case removed ; and such canse must exist at the time the application is made, (p. 805.)</p> <p>.4. Where a prisoner indicted for murder showed, that the sheriff of the county was against him and wrote a letter calculated to prejudice him, which was published in a newspaper printed and circulated in the prisoner’s county, and great excitement was shown to exist, and ten months after the homicide threats of lynching him wore made by a mob, the most of whom lived in or near the county-seat, where he would have to be tried. Het.d :</p> <p>Good cause was shown for a change of venue, (p. 808.)</p> <p>5. In empanelling a jury in a capital case a proposed juror'examined on his voir dire, who in answer to a question propounded by the court says, he has conscientious scruples against inflicting the death-penalty, is incompetent and is properly rejected by the court, although he says he will be governed by the law and the evidence, (p. 809.)</p> <p>6. Since our statute gives a jury a discretion, when they find a prisoner guilty of murder in the first degree, to say he shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary, it is more important to the State, that juries should have no conscientious scruples against inflicting the death penalty, (p. 809.)</p> <p>7. Proceeding in a trial in the absence of the prisoner in a felony case is fatal to the verdict. It is absolutely necessary, that the prisoner shall be present in court, when anything is done in his case in any way affecting his interest, (p. 811.) .</p> <p>8. Where in a murder-trial the State pro
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The right of self-defence may be exercised in behalf of a brother or a stranger.\
- \The right of selfdefence may be exercised in behalf of a brother or a stranger.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Othek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Ex Rel. Grob v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 134×
- State v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 134×
- State v. PendryWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1976-07-20· cited 108×
- State v. RileyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1966-11-22· cited 91×
- Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1950-12-12· cited 71×
- Feliciano v. 7-Eleven, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-12-11· cited 70×
- State v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 64×
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1962-02-13· cited 54×
- United States v. PuffSecond Circuit· 1954-05-03· cited 49×
- Dickeschied v. Exchange BankWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1886-09-18· cited 49×
- State Ex Rel. Dandy v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1964-02-25· cited 48×
- State v. PowersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1922-09-26· cited 47×
- State ex rel. Boner v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1964-07-17· cited 47×
- State of West Virginia v. Timothy Ray SutherlandWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-06-05· cited 45×
- Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1886-01-26· cited 44×
- State v. SchnelleWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1884-04-26· cited 43×
- State v. CobbsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1895-06-19· cited 33×
- State v. HobbsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1893-04-01· cited 31×
- Core v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1893-12-06· cited 27×
- State v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1922-12-12· cited 26×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1852-07-15· cited 175×
- Commonwealth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1844-07-15· cited 61×
- the People v. Ransom.New York Supreme Court· 1831-10-15· cited 46×
- Davis v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1857-11-15· cited 27×
- Hooker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1855-11-23· cited 27×
- Mayor of Columbus v. GoetchiusSupreme Court of Georgia· 1849-07-15· cited 26×
- State v. BabcockSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1815-11-15· cited 26×
- State v. McDonaldWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1876-09-11· cited 24×
- Romaine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1855-11-27· cited 23×
- Greenley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1877-11-15· cited 22×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 22×
- People v. PlummerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 20×
- Hudgins v.StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1878-08-15· cited 20×
- State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1882-11-18· cited 17×
- Brant ex dem. Buckbee v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court· 1827-10-15· cited 16×
- Curran's CaseSupreme Court of Virginia· 1850-06-06· cited 15×
- French v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont· 1827-02-15· cited 15×
- Hudspeth v. HerstonIndiana Supreme Court· 1878-11-15· cited 14×
- Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1876-10-15· cited 14×
- Hinman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa· 1870-04-12· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.