State v. Greensweig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling no logical distinction between prior and subsequent acts justifies per se rule excluding subsequent acts
• evidence of assault with intent to rape involving three young girls other than victim in prosecution for lewd conduct with a minor
• evidence admissible to show motive, intent, identity, absence of mistake, knowledge, common design, scheme of plan and modus operandi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).