State v. Greene-Pendergrass

Citations

• 228 Conn. App. 695

Syllabus

The defendant appealed from the judgments of the trial court revoking his probation in two separate dockets and sentencing him to an additional period of incarceration, claiming, inter alia, that the court abused its discretion in considering pending charges against him when making its decision. Held: The trial court did not improperly rely on various pending charges against the defendant in revoking his probation and imposing a term of incarceration, as, during a probation revocation hearing, a court may consider evidence of crimes for which the defendant was indicted but neither tried nor convicted. In light of the entire record, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed a total effective sentence representing nearly all of the defendant's remaining suspended sentences. Argued September 5—officially released October 15, 2024