Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 10/3/2017

State v. Greene

Citations

806 S.E.2d 343
255 N.C. App. 780

Syllabus

Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Fourth Amendment, Search and Seizure, Remedies, Sexual Offenses, Indecent Liberties, Sentencing, Satellite-Based Monitoring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when the State had the opportunity but failed to introduce evidence in showing the reasonableness of SBM, reversal—rather than vacatur and remand—is the appropriate disposition
holding that when the State had the opportunity but failed to introduce evidence in showing the reasonableness of SBM, reversal—rather than vacatur and remand—is the appropriate disposition
reasoning that \the nature of the State's burden was no longer uncertain at the time of the defendant's [14 November 2016 SBM] hearing\ (citation omitted)
noting that the State conceded that its “evidence was insufficient to establish that the enrollment constituted a reasonable Fourth Amendment search”
noting that the State conceded that its “evidence was insufficient to establish that the enrollment constituted a reasonable Fourth Amendment search”
reversing without remanding the lifetime SBM order where \[t]he State offered no further evidence beyond defendant's criminal record\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zachary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.