Skip to main content

State v. Green

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2729

Syllabus

R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), consecutive sentences, sentencing, nunc pro tunc. The trial court made the correct findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court sentenced the appellant to nine years imprisonment, but stated at the sentencing hearing that he was sentenced to eight years. The journal entry reflected the mistake the trial court made by stating the appellant was sentenced to eight years, but the aggregate sentence was actually nine years. A nunc pro tunc order can only be used to correct what the trial court actually did.

Judges: Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.