State v. Green
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2729
Syllabus
R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), consecutive sentences, sentencing, nunc pro tunc. The trial court made the correct findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court sentenced the appellant to nine years imprisonment, but stated at the sentencing hearing that he was sentenced to eight years. The journal entry reflected the mistake the trial court made by stating the appellant was sentenced to eight years, but the aggregate sentence was actually nine years. A nunc pro tunc order can only be used to correct what the trial court actually did.
Judges: Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State v. BrookeOhio Supreme Court· 2007-04-18· cited 175×
- State v. HitesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-30· cited 116×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 38×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 33×
- State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-22· cited 28×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-24· cited 23×
- State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2017-06-22· cited 22×
- State v. AmeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-17· cited 11×
- State v. CostillaOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.