Arizona Supreme Court· 2/19/1975
State v. Green
Citations
- 532 P.2d 506
- 111 Ariz. 444
- 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no distinction in the probative value of direct and circumstantial evidence.”
- “A conviction may be sustained on circumstantial evidence alone.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Hays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court· 1986-09-18· cited 110×
- Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-01-17· cited 86×
- State v. WinegarArizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 64×
- State v. SardoArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 55×
- State v. LeslieArizona Supreme Court· 1985-10-09· cited 54×
- State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-01-27· cited 29×
- Justice v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-04-26· cited 15×
- State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-05-25· cited 15×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-04-25· cited 12×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-01-10· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. BrownArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 8×
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-04-17· cited 5×
- State v. HarneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-01-29· cited 4×
- State v. MillionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-23· cited 3×
- State v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-07-19· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Whytte Dragun DuncanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-04-19· cited 1×
- State v. EggersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-29
- State of Arizona v. Zachary Samuel EggersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-29
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 699×
- State v. HarvillArizona Supreme Court· 1970-11-16· cited 126×
- State v. EdwardsArizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-23· cited 69×
- State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. WrenArizona Supreme Court· 1972-06-20· cited 42×
- Eddie Willie Taylor v. The State of Arizona, and Frank A. Eyman, WardenNinth Circuit· 1972-10-06· cited 37×
- State v. ChatmanArizona Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 14×
- State v. FishArizona Supreme Court· 1973-04-04· cited 12×
- State v. ThorntonArizona Supreme Court· 1972-02-09· cited 8×
- State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court· 1974-03-08· cited 6×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.