State v. Grayson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in [RCW 9.94A.589(3)] suggests that the court pronouncing ‘the sentence’ can divide it into two parts, one part to run concurrently with the other sentences and the other consecutively.”
• “The sentence must either be concurrent with another sentence or consecutive to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wahleithner v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-09-18· cited 44×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Costello
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-06· cited 24×
• In Re Costello
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-06· cited 23×
• State v. Champion
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-10-24· cited 11×
• State v. Champion
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-08· cited 11×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-10· cited 8×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Green
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-21· cited 6×
• State v. Buck
  Washington Supreme Court· 2024-03-14· cited 5×
• State v. Stewart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-11· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Grayson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-05-26· cited 232×
• Matter of Personal Restraint of Long
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-09-05· cited 23×
• State v. Grayson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-19· cited 21×