State v. Grayer
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3511
Syllabus
Guilty plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waiver of constitutional rights de novo standard of review totality of the circumstances Crim.R. 11 ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court's acceptance of defendant's guilty plea complied with Crim.R. 11(C) and was a valid waiver of his constitutional rights. Although the trial court (1) did not ask whether the defendant understood the constitutional rights he was being asked to waive, (2) did not stop after identifying each constitutional right and ask the defendant whether he waived each right, and (3) utilized a group-plea hearing, defendant's guilty plea was valid. The trial court referenced and explained the constitutional rights delineated in Crim.R. 11(C) as well as their waiver in a manner reasonably intelligible to the defendant.
Judges: Headen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-25· cited 9×
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-08· cited 6×
- State v. StrimpelOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-26· cited 5×
- State v. LozadaOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.