State v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in the text of ORS 137.540(6) requires the trial court to determine that a person willfully violated proba- tion before revoking probation.”
• trial court properly exercised its discretion to revoke proba- tion based on a determination that the defendant violated probation when the defendant claimed he was evicted from a group home but did not contest that he changed his resi- dence without prior permission
• trial court properly exercised its discretion to revoke proba- tion based on a determination that the defendant violated probation when the defendant claimed he was evicted from a group home but did not contest that he changed his resi- dence without prior permission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-22· cited 1×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• State v. Altman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-12· cited 6×
• Dane v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-12· cited 2×