State v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[WJhether the evidence in the original trial was strong or weak is only part of the question.”
• \[W]hether the evidence in the original trial was strong or weak is only part of the question.\
• \[W]hether the evidence in the original trial was strong or weak is only part of the question.\
• discussing possible favorable DNA test results
• making a similar favorable presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Crumpton
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 39×
• State v. Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-02-23· cited 35×
• State v. Gray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-28· cited 13×
• State Of Washington v. Kevin Jory Braa
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-02-12· cited 12×
• State v. Crumpton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-12-11· cited 6×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-29· cited 5×
• State v. Gray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-07-06
• State Of Washington, V. Robert Rufus Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2026-02-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jacobs
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-07-07· cited 385×
• State v. Riofta
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-06-11· cited 87×
• In Re Bradford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-14· cited 17×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Bradford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-14· cited 17×
• State v. Stivason
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-22· cited 7×