State v. Graves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that error was not harmless where “testimonial statements admitted in violation of [the] defendant’s right of confrontation were not entirely cumulative and instead added new, significant, and incriminating details to the state’s case-in-chief’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lavadores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05· cited 14×
• State v. Starr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-11· cited 8×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-28· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Davis v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
• State v. Camarena
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 25×
• State v. Graves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-18· cited 3×