State v. Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that because it was lawful for the court to regard the [third-party] deposit as defendant’s and available to satisfy defendant’s obligations under the judgment, it was within the court’s discretion to withhold its return for payment of defendant’s obligations under the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McKichan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-03-22· cited 33×
• State v. Goforth
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1989-03-07· cited 25×
• State v. Morales
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-11-19· cited 8×
• State v. Laune
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-15· cited 5×
• State v. Gutierrez Barajas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-05-28· cited 4×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-23· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-10-23· cited 7×