Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/20/2001
State v. Graham
Citations
- 67 Conn. App. 45
- 787 A.2d 11
- 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 585
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court did not abuse discretion in precluding missing witness argument because defendant \offered only a blanket statement that [the witness'] failure to testify demonstrated a weakness in the state's case\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dranginis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-17· cited 20×
- State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-23· cited 18×
- State v. McArthurConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-06-20· cited 13×
- State v. SaundersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-05-19· cited 10×
- Sturgeon v. SturgeonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-02· cited 9×
- State v. FernandezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-12-27· cited 9×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-03
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-15· cited 311×
- Smart-Davis v. Johns Hopkins UniversitySupreme Court· 2000-02-22· cited 97×
- State v. MalaveSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-21· cited 89×
- Case Farms of North Carolina, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1998-04-20· cited 65×
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-11-25· cited 55×
- State v. BanksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-01· cited 24×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-18· cited 23×
- State v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-05-23· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.