West Virginia Supreme Court· 1/5/2001

State v. Graham

Citations

541 S.E.2d 341
208 W. Va. 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “‘a witness may also be cross-examined about matters affecting his credibility. The term “credibility” includes the interest and bias of the witness, inconsistent statements made by the witness and to a certain extent the witness’ character.’” (internal citation omitted)
“Omissions from a trial transcript warrant a new trial only if the missing portion of the transcript specifically prejudices a defendant’s appeal”
“Omissions from a trial transcript warrant a new trial only if the missing portion of the transcript specifically prejudices a defendant’s appeal.”
allowed introduction of evidence of a prior first degree sexual abuse conviction of defendant during his trial for first degree sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maynard, Starcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.