State v. Graff
Citations
- 2023 ND 127
Syllabus
Dismissal of a criminal case with prejudice is a remedy that should only be used in extreme circumstances. In order to dismiss a criminal case with prejudice, a district court must make a finding of bad faith, harassment, or prosecutorial misconduct, and this finding must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. The State must be provided with notice, and an opportunity to respond, and lesser alternative sanctions must be considered before a district court may dismiss with prejudice. It is an abuse of discretion when a district court fails to consider whether lesser sanctions are available or appropriate before dismissing a criminal case with prejudice.
Judges: Jensen, Jon J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Jamestown v. SnellmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-11-19· cited 21×
- State v. BolenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 15×
- Quamme v. QuammeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-12-01· cited 15×
- State Ex Rel. Koppy v. GraffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 14×
- State v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 14×
- State v. TweetenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 13×
- State v. FerrieNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-09-23· cited 7×
- State v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-10-03· cited 3×
- State v. GraffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-07-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.