State v. Goyens

Citations

• 110 Kan. 421
• 204 P. 704
• 1922 Kan. LEXIS 63

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Evidence—Declarations of Coconspirators — When Inadmissible. On the separate trial of one charged jointly with others with the crime of grand larceny, the rule approved in The State v. Johnson, 40 Kan. 266, 19 Pac. 749, and other cases cited in the opinion, is followed, and held, error to admit evidence of declarations of one of the alleged conspirators in the absence of defendant for the reason that the declarations were not made in the furtherance of the common, criminal design and were made after the conspiracy had been consummated.</p>