Skip to main content
· 9/27/2002

State v. Goudeau

Citations

  • 85 S.W.3d 126
  • 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1978
  • 2002 WL 31133385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim of coerced verdict was waived where trial court informed jury that “[w]e do not plan for you to come back tomorrow. Please continue your deliberations” and defense counsel indicated that court’s statement was “fine”
  • discussion of destructive testimony and corroboration concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenneth W. Shrum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.