State v. Goss

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 2648

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive prison sentences. It found that consecutive sentences were necessary to protect the public from future crime and to punish appellant, that consecutive sentences were not disproportionate to the seriousness of his conduct and to the danger that he posed to the public, and that at least two of the multiple offenses were committed as part of a course of conduct and the harm caused by the offenses committed was so great or unusual that no single prison term adequately reflected the seriousness of appellant's conduct. Judgment affirmed.