Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/8/1980
State v. Goodlow
Citations
- 620 P.2d 1015
- 27 Wash. App. 769
- 1980 Wash. App. LEXIS 2450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing second degree theft from forgery for double jeopardy purposes; \theft conviction requires proof that the defendant actually gained control of the property\
- distinguishing second degree theft from forgery for double jeopardy purposes; \theft conviction requires proof that the defendant actually gained control of the property\
- distinguishing second degree theft from forgery for double jeopardy purposes; “theft conviction requires proof that the defendant actually gained control of the property” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
- State v. HessWashington Supreme Court· 1975-11-06· cited 48×
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1960-09-08· cited 31×
- State v. MorlockWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-02· cited 14×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-02-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.