State v. Goodenough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant invited the error when she and the state invoked the incorrect statutory framework
• concluding that the defendant invited the error when she and the state invoked the incorrect statutory framework
• “[T]he general rule is that if an appellant was actively instrumental in bringing about the error, then the appellant cannot be heard to com- plain, and the case ought not to be reversed because of it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Zolotoff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 12×
• State v. Cross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-09· cited 3×
• State v. Marshall-Lautt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×
• State v. Holycross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Oregon Railroad
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1904-06-27· cited 44×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-17· cited 41×
• State v. Cross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-09· cited 3×