State v. Goodall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding to determine whether this Court should “interfere with the exercise of the discretion of the trial judge in the imposition of sentence upon a defendant[,] . . . [t]he controlling question . . . is whether the facts show manifest abuse of discretion”
• indicating the facts of this case “disclose nothing [requiring us] to evoke the rare jurisdiction of this [C]ourt to interfere with the exercise of the discretion of the trial judge in the imposition of sentence upon a defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-21· cited 40×
• State v. Conally
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-07-26· cited 25×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-07-25· cited 20×
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-10-22· cited 17×
• State v. Benning
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 7×
• State v. HALL
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-02-10· cited 6×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Steadman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-04-12· cited 47×