State v. Gonzalez-Averado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Dr. Lane’s report was cited and heavily relied upon by Judge Boldt in his decision
• “The only rele vant evidence is that which was considered by Judge Boldt when he made his finding”
• “Swinomish offered no evidence that suggests that FF 6 is ambiguous or that the court intended something other than its apparent meaning when it rendered Decision I.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).