State v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s Rule 35 motion, even when defendant exercised good conduct while incarcerated and had support system in place upon release
• affirming denial of Rule 35 motion despite defendant’s good conduct while incarcerated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bakke
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2020-04-08· cited 3×
• State v. Jardin
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-05-05· cited 1×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Toohill
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-09-08· cited 3,704×
• State v. Reinke
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-11-16· cited 736×
• State v. Nice
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-05· cited 549×
• State v. Forde
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-06-23· cited 516×
• State v. Sanchez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-03-07· cited 428×
• State v. Colyer
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-12-14· cited 128×
• State v. Carrasco
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-02-09· cited 83×
• State v. Hooper
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-02-12· cited 37×
• State v. Swan
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-01-27· cited 18×
• State v. Carrasco
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-23· cited 14×
• State v. Sanchez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-01-02· cited 13×
• State v. Morrison
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-01-29· cited 12×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-02-21· cited 9×
• State v. Howard
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-12-11· cited 6×
• State v. Way
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-04-03· cited 4×
• State v. Ayala
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-05· cited 3×