Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 4/28/1982

State v. Gonzales

Citations

638 S.W.2d 841
1982 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “indictments are not open to challenge on the ground that there was inad equate or incom petent e vidence before th e grand jury to support it”
noting that alleged defect in grand jury proceedings should have been attacked in Tenn. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(1) pretrial motion
refusing to dismiss an indictment that was based upon unsworn testimony to the grand jury
refusing to dismiss an indictment that was based upon unsworn testimony to the grand jury
“[I]ndictments are not open to challenge on the ground that there was inadequate or incompetent evidence before the grand jury to support it.” (citations omitted)
“[I]ndictments are not open to challenge on the ground that there was inadequate or incompetent evidence before the grand jury to support it.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Duncan, Tatum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.