Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/10/2017
State v. Gomez
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8146
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - Contents of bill of particulars was sufficient Crim.R. 7(E) state not required to provide specific dates of alleged rape offenses when it does not possess more specific information indictment was likewise sufficient under Crim.R. 7(B) convictions not against manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court· 1985-06-05· cited 417×
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court· 2000-05-31· cited 125×
- State v. LawrinsonOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-14· cited 74×
- State v. RameyOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-22· cited 33×
- State v. CasselOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-17· cited 23×
- State v. GainesOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-03-28· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.