Utah Supreme Court· 5/6/1986
State v. Gomez
Citations
- 722 P.2d 747
- 33 Utah Adv. Rep. 21
- 1986 Utah LEXIS 804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding distinction between offense of “signing” sales slip while fraudulently using financial transaction card and offense of mere fraudulent use of financial transaction card was within legislative prerogative
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BluffUtah Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 85×
- State v. JeffriesUtah Supreme Court· 2009-09-01· cited 56×
- State v. KentCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-09-05· cited 12×
- State v. BankheadUtah Supreme Court· 1986-10-20· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. W.C.P.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-01-24· cited 11×
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-12-24· cited 7×
- State v. ArghittuCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-01-29· cited 5×
- State Ex Rel. WcpCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-02-11· cited 4×
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-09-18· cited 4×
- State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-04-20· cited 4×
- State v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court· 2011-12-13· cited 4×
- State v. ReddenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2022-01-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.