District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/23/2005
State v. Gomez
Citations
- 915 So. 2d 698
- 2005 WL 3116141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court erred in dismissing a case based upon a Brady violation when the destroyed evidence was only potentially useful and there was no evidence of bad faith
- finding no denial of due process after police lost booking photographs because the photographs were not material exculpatory evidence and police did not intentionally destroy them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ramirez, Suarez, and Cortiãas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 143×
- Lightbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-16· cited 23×
- State v. HugginsSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-06-07· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-26· cited 9×
- State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-28· cited 7×
- State v. MuroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-24· cited 6×
- State v. WestermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-26· cited 6×
- Felder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.