Idaho Court of Appeals· 12/21/1994

State v. Gomez

Citations

889 P.2d 729
126 Idaho 700
1994 Ida. App. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing that an explanation of a transaction constitutes hearsay if the words used indicate a particular fact
describing that an explanation of a transaction constitutes hearsay if the words used indicate a particular fact
describing that an explanation of a transaction constitutes hearsay if the words used indicate a particular fact
noting that although the drugs were not found on Gomez’s person, they were found in a place “readily accessible” to him
noting that given the evidence presented, in determining evidence of constructive possession, the jury could reasonably disbelieve Gomez’s story that he had fled from police for a benign reason rather than to conceal drugs
concurring with the view that a defendant's mere receipt of a sealed package containing contraband is insufficient to support his or her conviction for knowing or intentional possession of that contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Walters, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.