State v. Gomez
Citations
- 2025 ND 60
Syllabus
Section 12.1-32-02(2), N.D.C.C., requires the time spent in custody to be as a result of either the charge for which the sentence was imposed or the conduct on which the charge was based. The Court will review a claim of an illegal sentence even when the defendant did not raise this argument below by objecting at sentencing or through a motion under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35(a). Any credit for good time the defendant is entitled to must be stated in the criminal judgment.
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 91×
- In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-08-03· cited 55×
- State v. NoackNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 48×
- State v. EugeneNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-10-31· cited 41×
- In the Interest of PFNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 27×
- Interest of NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-06-29· cited 15×
- State v. McGinnisNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-03-03· cited 14×
- Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-08-19· cited 12×
- Gust v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-01· cited 10×
- State v. WilliamsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-01-10· cited 5×
- State v. EaglemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 4×
- Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-05-02· cited 2×
- State v. ThesingNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-05· cited 2×
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.