Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 3/10/2000
State v. Goldsberry
Citations
- 14 S.W.3d 770
- 2000 WL 190228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring motions to quash to be in writing to give the State an opportunity to amend indictment or “to prepare for a hearing on such issue”
- asserting “written notification preserves any error for appellate review”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor, Hedges, Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.