Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/16/1902
State v. Golden
Citations
- 86 Minn. 206
- 90 N.W. 398
- 1902 Minn. LEXIS 484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he gist of [the] offense [of burglary] is the breaking and entering any building with intent to commit a crime therein”
- explaining “[t]he gist of [] [burglary] is the breaking and entering any building with intent to commit a crime therein”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Start
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-04-03· cited 17×
- State v. Garcia-GutierrezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-04-02· cited 14×
- State v. GerouSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-05-02· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Webber v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-07-28· cited 10×
- State v. GrinoldsOregon Supreme Court· 1960-07-06· cited 8×
- Larson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1955-12-02· cited 5×
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1912-01-19· cited 2×
- United States v. GriecoS.D. New York· 1960-02-05· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tilly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1885-01-15· cited 37×
- People v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-12-08· cited 30×
- People v. ShaberCalifornia Supreme Court· 1867-07-01· cited 21×
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-11-18· cited 12×
- Hatfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1886-04-20· cited 6×
- Hale v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1895-12-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.