Oregon Supreme Court· 8/28/1984
State v. Goff
Citations
- 686 P.2d 1023
- 297 Or. 635
- 1984 Ore. LEXIS 1635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[a]n adult’s capacity to be aware at any time while the child was left unattended is relevant to the mental element of the crime”
- “[e]very responsible adult should know that fire is a likely danger when children are left alone with access to matches”
- whether a child is \unattended\ for purposes of the offense of child neglect is determined under the totality of the circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ibarra v. Holder, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 2013-07-12· cited 43×
- State v. ParagonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-15· cited 29×
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2012-10-16· cited 25×
- State v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-01· cited 3×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-26· cited 2×
- State v. ObeidiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 2×
- Ibarra v. Holder, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 2013-07-01
- International Wines West, Inc. v. Patrick Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-08-05
- State v. NegreteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-19
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-20
- Sotero Rivera-Mendoza v. Todd BlancheNinth Circuit· 2026-06-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.