· 3/24/1986
State v. Goad
Citations
- 707 S.W.2d 846
- 1986 Tenn. LEXIS 664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “[i]n order for an appellate court to review a record of excluded evidence, it is fundamental that such evidence be placed in the record”
- stating that counsel might supplement an inadequate offer of proof made at trial by submitting “an affidavit or other report” in support of the motion for new trial
- stating that “[i]n order for an appellate court to review a record of excluded evidence, it is fundamental that such evidence be placed in the record in some manner”
- If an inadequate offer of proof is made at trial, counsel may support the motion for new trial by “an affidavit or other report.”
- “In order for an appellate court to review a record of excluded evidence, it is fundamental that such evidence be placed in the record in some manner.”
- the murder of a store merchant during an armed robbery, with similar aggravating circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harbison, Brock, Fones, Cooper, Drowota
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.