Skip to main content
· 3/24/1986

State v. Goad

Citations

  • 707 S.W.2d 846
  • 1986 Tenn. LEXIS 664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[i]n order for an appellate court to review a record of excluded evidence, it is fundamental that such evidence be placed in the record”
  • stating that counsel might supplement an inadequate offer of proof made at trial by submitting “an affidavit or other report” in support of the motion for new trial
  • stating that “[i]n order for an appellate court to review a record of excluded evidence, it is fundamental that such evidence be placed in the record in some manner”
  • If an inadequate offer of proof is made at trial, counsel may support the motion for new trial by “an affidavit or other report.”
  • “In order for an appellate court to review a record of excluded evidence, it is fundamental that such evidence be placed in the record in some manner.”
  • the murder of a store merchant during an armed robbery, with similar aggravating circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harbison, Brock, Fones, Cooper, Drowota

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.