State v. Glines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• side door to house was subject to implied consent when visible from pub- lic sidewalk, equipped with doorbell, not fenced, and near front wall of defendant’s house
• side door to house was subject to implied consent when visible from pub- lic sidewalk, equipped with doorbell, not fenced, and near front wall of defendant’s house
• side door to house was subject to implied consent because it was visible from public sidewalk, equipped with a doorbell, not fenced, and near front wall of the house
• where there was no objective evidence that the defendant manifested an intent to exclude the public from seeking to contact him at the side door, defendant impliedly permitted casual visitors to contact him there
• officer properly went to side door to knock on door where “side entry is about eight feet from the front wall of defendant’s house” and “adjacent to a common driveway that defendant shares with his neighbor, is visible from the public sidewalk and is equipped with a doorbell”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).