State v. Glebock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that the defendant broke into the victim’s apartment and sent her a threatening postcard was admissible because it “indicate[d] hostility toward the victim and a settled purpose to harm or injure her”
• concluding in attempted first degree murder case that evidence that the defendant had previously broken into ex-wife’s apartment and sent her a threatening postcard was relevant and probative of a settled purpose to harm her
• stating that evidence that the defendant broke into the victim’s apartment and sent the victim a threatening postcard were relevant and admissible because they “indicate[d] hostility toward the victim and a settled purpose to harm or injure her”
• relations existing between the victim and the defendant prior to the commission of the crime were relevant and indicative of hostility toward the victim and a settled purpose to harm or injure
• “The relations existing between the victim [of a violent assault] and the defendant prior to the commission of the crime are relevant. These relations indicate hostility toward the victim and a settled purpose to harm the victim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).