State v. Glaraton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that severe aggravating circumstances were present in a case factually similar to Herberg
• upholding a departure more than four times the presumptive sentence based on numerous factors, including the gratuitous physical assault of the victim and the permanent nature of the injury inflicted
• reinstating sentence of greater-than-quadruple upward departure based on numerous aggravating factors, including “the infliction of psychological trauma” to victim
• affirming a greater than triple departure when defendant stuck a gun in the victim’s mouth and rectum, “inflicted gratuitous physical injury,” urinated on the victim’s face and forced the victim to lie in the urine, and ridiculed the victim’s religious beliefs
• penetration of victim in three different ways was aggravating factor supporting greater than quadruple departure
• three different types of penetration was aggravating factor supporting more than quadruple departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).