Skip to main content

State v. Gilliam

Citations

  • 373 S.E.2d 596
  • 296 S.C. 395
  • 1988 S.C. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the evidence supported both a self-defense charge and a voluntary manslaughter charge
  • holding the evidence supported both a self-defense charge and a voluntary manslaughter charge
  • finding trial judge erred in refusing to charge both self-defense and voluntary manslaughter because they are mutually exclusive
  • “Appellant’s testimony that the victim threatened him and then fired at him would support a finding of sufficient legal provocation and heat of passion”
  • “Appellant’s testimony that the victim threatened him and then fired at him would support a finding of sufficient legal provocation and heat of passion.”
  • “[The] jury may fail to find all the elements for self-defense but could find sufficient legal provocation and heat of passion to conclude the defendant was guilty of voluntary manslaughter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.