Ohio Supreme Court· 8/11/1992
State v. Gillard
Citations
- 1992 Ohio 48
Syllabus
Criminal law - Trial court knows or reasonably should know of attorney's possible conflict of interest in representation of person charged with a crime - Court has affirmative duty to inquire whether a conflict of interest actually exists .
Judges: Douglas, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HaugabrookOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-15· cited 6×
- State v. AshleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-19· cited 3×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-02· cited 3×
- State v. FeemorluOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-02· cited 2×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-09· cited 2×
- State v. BurtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-26· cited 1×
- State v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-06
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.