Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/8/2019

State v. Gillam

Citations

2019 Ohio 808

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for obstructing official business was supported by sufficient evidence. Further, Appellant's conviction for resisting arrest was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Easterling
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 21×
State v. Mattle
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-26· cited 3×
State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-22· cited 2×
State v. Zupancic
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-26· cited 1×
State v. Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-29· cited 1×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-18· cited 1×
State v. Warren
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-21

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.